Publication Ethics for Hansen Scientific Publication Society Journals

At the Hansen Scientific Publication Society, we are committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in publishing. We adhere to internationally recognized practices to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of research disseminated through our journals. Our publication ethics apply to authors, editors, reviewers, and the publishing team involved in the manuscript submission and review process.

1. Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

Originality and Plagiarism:

  • Authors must ensure that their manuscripts are original and not under consideration elsewhere.

  • All data, results, and findings presented in the manuscript must be the author's own work, and any sources or ideas from other authors must be properly cited.

  • Plagiarism, in any form (including self-plagiarism), is strictly prohibited and will result in the rejection of the manuscript.

Authorship:

  • Only individuals who have made substantial contributions to the research and manuscript should be listed as authors.

  • All co-authors must approve the manuscript and its submission to the journal.

  • Authors should disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence the content of the manuscript.

Data Availability and Reproducibility:

  • Authors should ensure that the data supporting the conclusions of the manuscript are available for review and reproducibility.

  • If applicable, authors must make data, methodologies, or supplementary materials available for verification or replication.

Ethical Approval:

  • Research involving human or animal subjects must be conducted in compliance with ethical standards and the appropriate ethical approval obtained.

  • Authors must provide information about the ethical approval process in the manuscript.

2. Ethical Responsibilities of Editors

Editorial Independence:

  • Editors are responsible for making decisions regarding manuscript submissions based on the scientific merit and adherence to journal guidelines, without influence from external pressures or conflicts of interest.

Confidentiality:

  • Editors must maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts under review. They should not share or disclose any details of the manuscript to unauthorized individuals.

Fairness and Objectivity:

  • Editors must evaluate manuscripts objectively and fairly, considering the quality and relevance of the work. Personal bias or preference should not influence editorial decisions.

  • If an editor has a conflict of interest with a manuscript, they must recuse themselves from the review process.

Ensuring Timeliness:

  • Editors should make every effort to ensure that the peer review and publication process is conducted in a timely manner.

  • They should communicate with authors and reviewers regularly to ensure efficient progress of the manuscript.

3. Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

Confidentiality:

  • Reviewers must treat all manuscripts as confidential and not share the content or any information about the manuscript with others without permission from the editor.

Constructive Feedback:

  • Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, objective, and detailed feedback on manuscripts. Comments should focus on the scientific merit of the work and contribute to the improvement of the manuscript.

  • Personal criticism of the authors is unacceptable.

Conflict of Interest:

  • Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality in evaluating the manuscript. If a conflict of interest is identified, the reviewer should recuse themselves from the review process.

Timeliness:

  • Reviewers should provide their feedback in a timely manner to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process. If a reviewer cannot complete the review within the agreed timeframe, they should notify the editor.

4. Ethical Responsibilities of the Publishing Team

Transparency:

  • The publishing team is committed to providing clear, transparent information to authors, reviewers, and readers regarding the submission, review, and publication process.

  • Any changes to the publication process, journal policies, or ethics guidelines will be communicated to stakeholders in a timely manner.

Accuracy and Integrity of Published Content:

  • The publishing team ensures that the content published in our journals is accurate, honest, and free from fabrication or manipulation. Any errors or inaccuracies identified post-publication will be promptly corrected.

  • The publishing team will work with editors and authors to issue corrections or retractions if necessary, in cases of scientific misconduct or significant errors.

Protection of Intellectual Property:

  • The publishing team will take appropriate measures to protect the intellectual property rights of authors and contributors.

  • Copyright and licensing information will be clearly outlined, and authors will be given the option to publish their work under an open access model.

5. Ethical Responsibilities of the Journal

Fairness in Publication:

  • Hansen Scientific Publication Society ensures that all manuscripts are processed and reviewed fairly and consistently, regardless of the author’s gender, nationality, ethnicity, or institutional affiliation.

Protection Against Misconduct:

  • The journal is committed to identifying and addressing any form of research misconduct, including falsification of data, manipulation of results, and plagiarism.

  • Any suspected misconduct will be thoroughly investigated, and appropriate actions will be taken, including retraction of the manuscript or article if necessary.

Handling Complaints and Appeals:

  • The journal has a clear process for handling complaints and appeals from authors, reviewers, or readers. These will be addressed promptly and in a fair manner.